# Re-allocate the FiRM Market Ceilings for USR LP Markets

**URL:** <https://forum.inverse.finance/t/re-allocate-the-firm-market-ceilings-for-usr-lp-markets/620>\
**Category:** FiRM\
**Created:** [November 1, 2025, 10:10pm UTC](https://forum.inverse.finance/t/re-allocate-the-firm-market-ceilings-for-usr-lp-markets/620 "2025-11-01T22:10:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cryptoharry](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/inverse/user_avatar/forum.inverse.finance/cryptoharry/32/22_2.png) [@cryptoharry](https://forum.inverse.finance/u/cryptoharry)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2025, 10:10pm UTC](https://forum.inverse.finance/t/re-allocate-the-firm-market-ceilings-for-usr-lp-markets/620/1 "2025-11-01T22:10:27Z")

</div>

# Proposal to Re-allocate the FiRM Market Ceilings for USR LPs

## Summary

Rebalance the existing $50 million FiRM debt ceiling for the USR-backed LPs by shifting capacity full from DOLA/USR to DOLA/wstUSR.

| Variant | Current Ceiling | Proposed Ceiling | Change |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| yv-DOLA/USR | $5m | 0 | -$5m |
| DOLA/USR | $20m | 0 | -$20m |
| yv-DOLA/wstUSR | $5m | $10m | +$5m |
| DOLA/wstUSR | $20m | $40m | +$20m |
| Total | $50m | $50m | 0 |

The overall risk exposure stays constant; only its distribution changes.

## Background

- **Collateral listing** : DOLA/USR LP ([Convex](https://www.inverse.finance/governance/proposals/mills/274) & [Yearn](https://www.inverse.finance/governance/proposals/mills/275)) was enabled in March 2025; DOLA/wstUSR ([Convex](https://www.inverse.finance/governance/proposals/mills/321) & [Yearn](https://www.inverse.finance/governance/proposals/mills/320)) was enabled in October 2025
- **Performance** : the USR-backed market has consistently been the top-performing (or one of the top-performing) markets on FiRM

## Motivation

- **Better Performance:** The wstUSR variant LP has performed better, despite a lower RESOLV point multiplier (20x compared with 30x on DOLA/USR)
- **Long-term sustainability** : Switching to the yield-bearing variant is more sustainable in the long run because the yield will always be available, whereas the value of point incentives is likely to decrease over time.
- **Unchanged risk profile** : Total debt, LTV parameters, and oracle sources remain exactly as already approved.

## On-Chain Actions

- Set the market ceiling of Yearn DOLA/USR FiRM Market to 0 DOLA
- Set the market ceiling of Convex DOLA/USR FiRM Market to 0 DOLA
- Set the market ceiling of Yearn DOLA/wstUSR FiRM Market to 10m DOLA
- Set the market ceiling of Convex DOLA/wstUSR FiRM Market to 40m DOLA